Re: A92: POTM
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A92: POTM
No, but the whole staff has problems...
Bryan
----- Original Message -----
From: Noah Medling <medlingn@zdnetonebox.com>
To: <assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 1999 7:43 AM
Subject: Re: A92: POTM
>
> That's a big statement. just because they got the potm votes messed up,
doesen't mean they suck.
>
> Noah Medling
> http://xp.calc.org/
>
>
> ---- "Bryan Rabeler" <rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu> wrote:
> >
> > Maybe it can be summed up by saying: ticalc.org sucks.
> >
> > :P
> >
> > Bryan
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Cliff L. Biffle <cbiffle@safety.net>
> > To: <assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 1999 5:20 PM
> > Subject: Re: A92: POTM
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > >I recently noticed that the current POTM voting page has the TI-92+
> > > >and TI-89 grouped together. Please forgive my ignorance, but I don't
> > > >really understand why this should be, as the 89 and 92+ seem not to
> > > >be identical to me. If anyone can explain this, please enlighten me.
> > >
> > > It isn't your ignorance, it's on the part of TICALC.ORG. They've long
> > > shown some confusion about the 92+ platform. Some software is 89/92+
> > > compatible, but most isn't--keymappings are different, primarily. I
think
> > > this is along the same lines of why they'll give a headline spot to
some
> > > new game for the 83 while totally disregarding the release of Prosit
> > (which
> > > happened a few months back).
> > > --Cliff Biffle
> > >
> > > Optimist: This glass is half full.
> > > Pessimist: This glass is half empty.
> > > Cynic: They drank my water. Figures.
> > > Engineer: The glass should be -half- this size!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
> ___________________________________________________________________
> To get your own FREE ZDNet onebox - FREE voicemail, email, and fax,
> all in one place - sign up today at http://www.zdnetonebox.com
>
>
>
Follow-Ups:
References: