Re: A92: Doorsos: BSS blocks: initialized or not ?

Re: A92: Doorsos: BSS blocks: initialized or not ?

• To: assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: A92: Doorsos: BSS blocks: initialized or not ?
• From: Cliff Biffle <cbiffle@safety.net>
• Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 15:38:16 -0700
• Delivered-To: assembly-92-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
• Delivered-To: assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org
• In-reply-to: <199903122217.XAA15704@kobra.efd.lth.se>
• References: <36E95E93.728C@mail.dotcom.fr>
• Reply-To: assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org

>It couldn't hurt but it would be non-standard. But then this is a very
>small platform.

And it wouldn't necessarily be non-standard if the shell did it.  It'd be
better, perhaps, if it was just a function call.  That way programs that
came before the function would still operate the same way, but newer
programs could call the function.

--Cliff Biffle

• Re: A92: Doorsos: BSS blocks: initialized or not ?
• From: Niklas Brunlid <e96nbr@efd.lth.se>

• A92: Doorsos: BSS blocks: initialized or not ?
• From: Xavier VASSOR <xvassor@mail.dotcom.fr>
• Re: A92: Doorsos: BSS blocks: initialized or not ?
• From: Niklas Brunlid <e96nbr@efd.lth.se>

• Prev: Re: A92: Doorsos: BSS blocks: initialized or not ?
• Next: Re: A92: Doorsos: BSS blocks: initialized or not ?
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread