Re: A92: Basic AND ASM -- Read?

To: assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A92: Basic AND ASM -- Read?
From: "David Kühling" <dkuehlin@hell1og.be.schule.de>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 09:41:09 +0100
Delivered-To: assembly-92-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
References: <af9e4fee.369a81c5@aol.com>
Reply-To: assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org


TurboSoft@aol.com wrote:
> 
> In a message dated 1/11/99 6:22:58 AM Eastern Standard Time,
> dkuehlin@hell1og.be.schule.de writes:
> 
> > > wait l don't understand what you mean about the "formats of the
> >  > routines"
> >
> >  I meant the syntax. num is the number of the folder/file in the
> >  folder/file list (#0 = 1st folder/file, #1 = 2nd...)
> 
> why can't it just be that one command returns strings within a list of
> all the
> folders, and another command would return a list of all the var.s in a
> certain
> folder?
> like:
> getfolds()      ;there is already a getfold() command
>                         {"games","main","school"}
> getvars(main)   OR      getvars("main")         one or the other
>                         {"doors","doorsos","hexlib","ziplib"}

The lists are more difficult than strings...
And after all, whether you access the folders by foldlst[...] or
by getfold(...) is more or less the same, isn't it?

References:

Re: A92: Basic AND ASM -- Read?

From: TurboSoft@aol.com