Re: A92: Plus C suggestion
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A92: Plus C suggestion
In a message dated 1/9/99 7:30:17 PM Eastern Standard Time, HonorIam2@aol.com
writes:
> First of all, I want to congradulate you guys for starting to write this
> compiler.
> As far as the compiler goes you should provide a documentation on your
> implementation of the routines (i.e. explain that the for(,,,){...} command
> uses such and such register for it's increments. This way when you
> preprocess
> your files us programmers can use an asm{...} block for our own code. You
> should keep as many of the defined functions in a header file so that
> programmers like us will be able to expand on your routines as easily as
> possible and be more versatile with putting asm blocks next to C language
> blocks.
yes, l've never used or even the C language, but l think it's pretty popular.
l'm guessing it's kind of like Basic? Anyway l agree with what that guy says,
it would be really good to have a list of what all the functions do and their
syntax, kinda like the function listing in the back of your calc manual.
--TurboSoft
Visit the TurboSoft Homepage: The most current Basic programs created by
TurboSoft for the 89.
<A HREF="http://members.aol.com/turbosoft/turbosoft.html">
http://members.aol.com/turbosoft/turbosoft.html</A>
Follow-Ups: