A92: Plus C suggestion

To: assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: A92: Plus C suggestion
From: HonorIam2@aol.com
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1999 19:29:07 EST
Delivered-To: assembly-92-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Reply-To: assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org


	First of all, I want to congradulate you guys for starting to write this
compiler.
	As far as the compiler goes you should provide a documentation on your
implementation of the routines (i.e. explain that the for(,,,){...} command
uses such and such register for it's increments. This way when you preprocess
your files us programmers can use an asm{...}  block for our own code.  You
should keep as many of the defined functions in a header file so that
programmers like us will be able to expand on your routines as easily as
possible and be more versatile with putting asm blocks next to C language
blocks.
I am also interested, I know C and the 68k well and might be able to help you
on any syntaxing conventions for register assignination.
Here to help
-Tim Adkisson
<a href="honorIam2@aol.com">honorIam2@aol.com</a>

Follow-Ups:

Re: A92: Plus C suggestion

From: Keith Kirton <kkirton@acex.com>

Prev: Re: A92: Revolution in TI92 World : Nested Folder
Next: Re: A92: [ABOUT] Fargo Program Editor 2.
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread