Re: A92: Re: Ti-92 +

To: <assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: A92: Re: Ti-92 +
From: "SMC12" <scross@san.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 16 May 1998 21:22:23 -0700
Delivered-To: assembly-92-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Reply-To: assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org



-----Original Message-----
From: Aaron Hertz <ahertz@yahoo.com>
To: assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: Saturday, May 16, 1998 7:57 PM
Subject: Re: A92: Re: Ti-92 +


>
>
>
>=?iso-8859-1?Q?Hugo_Bernab=E9?= <hugober@hol.fr> wrote:
>>
>>
>> >I don't think so. Because Archive memory is not ROM.
>> >On TI92+, ROM can be updated because it is flash ROM. But archive
>memory is RAM,
>> >for bug free programs for example that you don't you want to be
>deleted by
>> >keyboard mistake ...
>>
>>
>> As I have already said, i haven't got the module so i can't really
>know.
>> But maybe the ti92+ uses flash rom to store archive memory.
>>
>> hugo
>> hugober@hol.fr
>If I read the FAQ correctly, the 92+ does use flash ROM to store the
>user data archive, so it should not be erased when the calc is reset.
>==
>--==Aaron Hertz==--
>-=ahertz@yahoo.com=-  <----  New Address!
>
Userdata is 356 or so of basically EuP-style memory, since the 92 can only
address 256k of ram.