Re: A92: assembling errors
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A92: assembling errors
fi97 Guillaume POTHIER wrote:
> >
> > did anyone have problems with assembling the programs. i know how to use the
> > programs but everytime i try it gives me crap about libraries that im using
> > and i end up with tons of errors. i remember this sorta thing happening when
> > i first started programming on fargo I. ive been thinking maybe its because
> > of tabs instead of spaces but i didnt wanna go edit all the headers for the
> > libs yet cuz that would suck if it wasnt that. anyone know?
> >
>
> I had such a problem some time ago with fargo I (ie lots of errors without any
> meaning). The way I solved it is quite strange, but it worked for me and for
> another guy of this list who had the same problem : at the end of the code,
> add a lot of useless labels :
> False0001:
> False0002:
> False0003:
> etc etc
>
> (try about 50 labels)
If these things help, to get a Fargo program compiled, here is another idea:
Increase the memory read/write waitstates, and any other things, that have
a positive effect on your CPU, in your BIOS. It helped me once, when
my brother had set down the waitstates. Win95 run propably, but Fargo
crashed, everytime I used flib functions. (I know, this sounds a little bit
curious,
but it was excactly as I said)
References: