RE: A92: .Wav---->.92p

• To: "'assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org'" <assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org>
• Subject: RE: A92: .Wav---->.92p
• From: "Williams, Matt" <Williams.Matt@con-way.com>
• Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 15:20:20 -0800
• Delivered-To: assembly-92-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
• Reply-To: assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org

You are correct.

>----------
>From: 	Richard Kanarek[SMTP:RKanarek@Sprintmail.com]
>Reply To: 	assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org
>Sent: 	Monday, March 16, 1998 7:13 PM
>To: 	assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org
>Subject: 	Re: A92: .Wav---->.92p
>
>
>Hello.
>
>I know nothing of TI-92 programming but I do believe that...
>
>David Kühlin wrote:
>> (I haven't got a TI-85, but I often programed 80286-asm, and I think
>> Z80 is the base of all Intel-chips)
>
>...is, unfortunately, incorrect. While the Ziglog Z-80 uses, I
>understand, a superset of the Intel 8080 instructions, that is rather a
>long way from being similar to an 8086 let alone an 80286. If I'm
>mistaked, please feel welcome to correct me!
>
>Cordially,
>Richard Kanarek
>

• Prev: Re: A92: .Wav---->.92p
• Next: Re: A92: TI's numbering system
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread