>Yes, it still runs a 68k, and it has 188k of RAM plus an >additional 384k in FLASH memory. WHY IT COULDN'T BE 68030, 68040 OR 68060 ???????? The calculator would be VERY better !!! Because it seems to be exactly the same as the TI92 with the Plus Module. It would be a REAL dream to use a better processor. (and will the Plus Module be released, even if there is such a TI89 ?) Benoit SCHERRER p.c.scherrer@wanadoo.fr