RE: A92: Fargo on the 89?

To: <assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: RE: A92: Fargo on the 89?
From: "Dennis Ng" <onpaws@geocities.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 1998 23:53:33 -0400
Delivered-To: assembly-92-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <a1daccbd.35946071@aol.com>
Reply-To: assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org




>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org
>[mailto:owner-assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org]On Behalf Of
>TurboSoft@aol.com
>Sent: Friday, June 26, 1998 11:01 PM
>To: assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org
>Subject: Re: A92: Fargo on the 89?
>
>
>
>In a message dated 6/26/98 12:45:58 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
>brabeler@isd.ingham.k12.mi.us writes:
>
>> That's true, but the 83 didn't need a shell either and now we have
>>  AShell83 and SOS.  David said he was probably going to make a special
>>  version of Fargo for the 89.
>
>That would be cool.
>
>l have a question.  it's either smart or really dumb, l don't know because l
>don't have a 92.  Anyway can calculators that have to have a hacked assembly
>shell (like Fargo and then ZShell for the 85) have interrupts that work during
>normal use of the calculator?  like the interrupts and (l guess TSRs) on the
>86.
>

no, fargo doesn't allow anyone to change the interrups for normal operation. This is b/c relocation causes the interrupt called, to
crash the calculator.

Follow-Ups:

RE: A92: Fargo on the 89?

From: Niklas Brunlid <e96nbr@efd.lth.se>

References:

Re: A92: Fargo on the 89?

From: TurboSoft@aol.com