Re: A92: Fargo on the 89?


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: A92: Fargo on the 89?




probably just the shells

>Yes, but until TI releases information about the 92+ ASM format we'll
>probably need Fargo anyway.  Besides, (I'm assuming) existing Fargo
programs
>would need to be converted to the 92+ format in order to use TI's assembly
>support, and authors who don't own a 92 Plus probably won't bother.