Re: A92: New Fargocompiler
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A92: New Fargocompiler
Obviously. I don't ever remember getting this mail (the phrase WAY-MOMMA
confirms this in my mind) I just thought this was all very strange
~Adamman
In a message dated 98-06-02 22:57:51 EDT, you write:
> On Tue, 2 Jun 1998 ADAMMAN106@aol.com wrote:
>
> > In a message dated 98-06-02 07:17:31 EDT, you write:
> >
> > > On Fri, 29 May 1998, Alexander Grutsch wrote:
> >
> > I think your mail server is REALLY lagged
>
> then you obviously didn't notice the message from Trey Jazz marked March
> 18 that arrived June 1st concerning the HP48GX and the TI92 conversation.
> According to the ti-calc mailing list archives for June,
> (http://www.ticalc.org/mailarchive/assembly-92/1998_June)
> Trey's message fell between one postmarked June 1, 14:50 and one at 19:37,
> same day, as show below (take from the ti-calc mailing list archives)
>
> -----
> From: fondacci christophe <tchi_98@yahoo.com>
> Date: Mon, 1 Jun 1998 14:50:52 -0700 (PDT)
>
> To: <assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org>
> Subject: Re: A92: HP 48GX And TI92
> From: "Trey Jazz" <joemama@minot.com>
> Date: Wed, 18 Mar 1998 19:35:52 -0600
> Delivered-To: assembly-92-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
> Reply-To: assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org
>
> From: Anton Ivanov <ivanova@ucs.orst.edu>
> Date: Mon, 01 Jun 1998 19:37:46 -0700
> -----
>
> now THAT is what I call WAY-MOMMA lagged. 75 days?!?! no amount of
> REALLYs would be sufficient. :) And I find it kind of funny that no one
> noticed that but you noticed the three-day lag. And looking at logs, it's
> not a lag, but I assume something else, as his mail server had the correct
> date on the 30th of May (also from the archives), and two days later had
> the date set back to March 18th.
>
> Jonathan Dickmann
> -----
> jdickman@rhf.bradley.edu http://rhf.bradley.edu/~jdickman
> -----
> "Yes, you're very smart. Shut up."
> -- Peter Falk as Grandpa, The Princess Bride