Re: A92: Differences in TI92+ programming

Re: A92: Differences in TI92+ programming

• To: assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: A92: Differences in TI92+ programming
• From: Niklas Brunlid <e96nbr@efd.lth.se>
• Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1998 21:12:12 +0200
• Delivered-To: assembly-92-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
• In-Reply-To: <01bdd05b$3bcaf500$2397b7c2@dopegod>
• Reply-To: assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org

At 21:04 1998-08-25 +0200, you wrote: 
>
> What are the big differences in programming of the Ti92+?
> Can someone give me informations or examples? 
>  
> I'll probably port Fargo Pascal to the TI92+ ( Fargo Pascal 0.9.20 )
>  
> --
> MXM-TriX
> <http://start.at/mxm>http://start.at/mxm


PlusShell can compile all (I think) Fargo II sources provided that
1) You don't use BSS variables.
2) The libraries are available.
3) You don't have any *code* before _main.
4) You don't use numerical adresses (i.e. $4440 instead of #LCD_MEM).


Niklas Brunlid - http://www.efd.lth.se/~e96nbr
PQF Quote follows:

It was possibly the most circumspect advance in the history of military
manoeuvres, right down at the bottom end of the scale that things like the
Charge of the Light Brigade are at the top of.
        -- The City Watch takes action
           (Terry Pratchett, Guards! Guards!)

• A92: Differences in TI92+ programming
• From: "Grutsch Alexander" <alexander.grutsch.htlr@schulen.vol.at>

• Prev: A92: Differences in TI92+ programming
• Next: A92: running sqrxz on fargo II
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread