Re: A92: Plusshell

To: assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A92: Plusshell
From: Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1998 21:26:16 +0200 (MET DST)
Delivered-To: assembly-92-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
In-Reply-To: <6d8265e9.35d0994d@aol.com>
Reply-To: assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org


I agree.  If you take a look at the TI-83 situation, there are two shells
- AShell83 and SOS.  They are pretty similar and most authors are
releasing versions for both shells.  That just creates twice as many files
as we need and creates more confusion.

David sometimes has these sporatic moments where he disappears.  I have no
idea what he is doing right now.  But please do try to get in contact with
him to see how things are going.  A "merge" between Fargo and your
PlusShell would be an overall good thing for the TI community.  Just look
at the TI-92, there is one shell, let us keep it that way for the TI-92
Plus too.

-- 
Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
   File Archives, News, Features, HTML, and Support
   the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/

On Tue, 11 Aug 1998 NDStein@aol.com wrote:

> 
> I just have a few things to say about Plusshell before it goes too far.  It's
> nice to have it for now, but please don't add any Plusshell-specific (i.e. not
> fargo compatible) features.  Soon David will be coming out with Fargo for the
> 92+.  The 92 seems to be the only calculator left with just one shell, and I
> think everything goes much more smoothly when there's just one shell.  Maybe
> you could talk to David about working with him on Fargo for the 92+.  On the
> other hand, thank you for bringing usable assembly support to the 92+ so
> quickly.
>

References:

A92: Plusshell

From: NDStein@aol.com