Re: A92: 2.1 vs. 1.11 (rom ver)
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A92: 2.1 vs. 1.11 (rom ver)
Alexis wrote:
> > I also have ROM v1.11, but I'm not mad about it. A ROMv 1.11 is not
> really
> > that old at all, now ROM v1.3 and around there is. You have a good
> calc
> Are you sure the latest version isn't 1.12 ? I thought the order was
> 1.0,
> 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4,...,1.10,1.12,... 2.1
Yes, they don't go in normal order. Take the number right of the
decimal point, then put them in order, that's what order they came out
in (of course 2.xx is later than 1.xx).
--
''~``
( o o )
____.oooO__(_)__Oooo.__________
/ Tony Lieuallen \
[ arantius@erols.com ]
[ .oooO http://gifs.home.ml.org]
[ ( ) Oooo. ]
\____\ (____( )_______________/
\_) ) /
(_/
Q: What's black and white, black and white, black and white, and black
and blue?
A: A nun that fell down the stairs.
Q: What's black and white and is laughing hard?
A: The nun who pushed her.
References: