RE: A92: RE:256k and fargo

To: "'assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org'" <assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: RE: A92: RE:256k and fargo
From: Jean-Jacques MICHEL <jjm@han.daewoo.fr>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 1997 08:47:42 +0100
Reply-To: assembly-92@lists.ticalc.org


>>Hello Jean
>>sorry to tell you, that it didn't work, the checksum of the backup that you sent 
>>me was wrong, so winlink denied to transfer it. You see, I got to do the work on 
>>my own, what a pity.

Sorry I didn't thought there was a checksum : I worked on a new patch program this
morning and here is the result

 

By the way : I was using winlink beta 6, and there was no mention of any checksum error
(I am using the wputfargo.bat facility, but I don't think you can use it with an already
pre-installed backup...)
With the new patch, I realised that the classical LINK.EXE is also working (there was a
bug from my part, sorry...)

												JJM

fargo256.zip

Follow-Ups:

Re: RE: A92: RE:256k and fargo

From: Arno.Kizina@t-online.de (Arno Kizina)

Prev: A92: RE:256k and fargo
Next: Re: A92: 256K & interrupt routines
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread