Re: LF: TI-92 Emulator

To: list-fargo@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: LF: TI-92 Emulator
From: Mark Henry <drgnlrd@intrepid.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 1997 16:08:06 -0400
In-Reply-To: <33B534C8.9823B323@gconn.com>
References: <tcppop3.397882@gconn.com>
Reply-To: list-fargo@lists.ticalc.org

I believe the TI-92 does not use an actual 68000, but uses some variation
of the 68000, which means you couldn't upgrade using a 68010 anyway.

-Mark-


At 08:59 AM 6/28/97 -0700, you wrote:
>>         I think that a TI-92 Emulator For mac is possible because of
>> the same
>> processor (68k).  Also Upgrading the '92 with a better processor.
>
>Both of these ideas have been discussed before.  I don't know what's
>going on with the Mac, whether an emulator is being worked on or not,
>because I don't have a Mac.  As for upgrading the processor on the '92,
>if I remember correctly from the previous discussions, only the 68010
>processor has the same pin layout as the 68000.  All of the other 68xxx
>processors are not the same size (physically) as the 68k.  As for the
>machine language of the 68010, I don't think anyone was sure if it was
>the same.
>
>-Joel Murphy
>
>
>
>

Follow-Ups:

Re: LF: TI-92 Emulator

From: highlander15@juno.com

References:

From:

Re: LF: TI-92 Emulator

From: Joel Ethan Murphy <phantasy@gconn.com>