Re: LF: ROM version numbers.

To: list-fargo@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: LF: ROM version numbers.
From: Bendzick <bendzick@millcomm.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 1996 18:22:46 -0600
References: <1.5.4.32.19961226225900.00679554@ACD1.byu.edu>
Reply-To: list-fargo@lists.ticalc.org

Nathan Stocks wrote:
> 
> Do the ROM versions go like THIS:
> 1.0
> 1.1
> 1.11
> 1.12
> 1.2
> 1.3
> etc.
> 
> Or like THIS:
> 1.0
> 1.1
> 1.2
> 1.3
> ...
> 1.10
> 1.11
> 1.12
> 
> I just bought a TI-92 last month with ROM version 1.12.  I am trying to
> figure out if they gave me a new version or an old version.
> 
> Nathan Stocks
> KDStocks@ACD1.byu.edu
It goes in the second manner, with 1.12 being read as 1 point twelve.

-Michael Bendzick
bendzick@millcomm.com

References:

LF: ROM version numbers.

From: Nathan Stocks <KDStocks@acd1.byu.edu>

Prev: Re: LF: ROM version numbers.
Next: Re: LF: FTerm is hopeless now, but... HAHAHAHHAH!!!!
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread