I would be very interested –
especially if it covered on some topics that I haven’t found in my search
for tutorials (like optimization tricks)
-----Original Message-----
From:
assembly-89-bounce@lists.ticalc.org
[mailto:assembly-89-bounce@lists.ticalc.org] On
Behalf Of Greg Dietsche
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 7:56
PM
To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: [A89] Re: Newbie alert!
Here is a good comparison... i think
they drifted in to some minor technical details towards the thread... ;)
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday,
August 22, 2003 8:49 PM
Subject: [A89] Re:
Newbie alert!
Nothing aside from where rom calls are located but a
jump table points to
the addresses of the calls in each version.
nostub: Pros - self contained so no need for a library or shell (still need
a shell or patch for size limitations)
Cons - can be
bloated because everything is internal
shell/library requiring programs: Pros - external library makes for smaller
code, can fix bugs in library and not have to recompile your program
(doesn't much matter)
Cons - end user needs to find
the library you used if you didn't or couldn't include it with your program
I prefer to do nostub but the choice is up to you.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nick Tarleton" <nickptar@mindspring.com>
To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 7:46 PM
Subject: [A89] Newbie alert!
> Being a newbie, I have some obligatory questions:
> 1. What is the difference, assembly-programmer-wise, between different AMS
> versions?
> 2. What are the pros and cons of Nostub vs. Kernel programs?
> --
> http://earth.prohosting.com/tqbay
> "I love deadlines. I love the whooshing sound they make as they go
by."
> - Douglas Adams
> Nick Tarleton - nickptar@mindspring.com
- PGP key available
>
>
>