[A89] Re: more questions (return value)
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
[A89] Re: more questions (return value)
http://www.technoplaza.net/programs/proginfo.cgi?id=93&details=1
I found it off some university page. It's 8 Megs, but it's got a lot of
useful information on it.
John David Ratliff
jdratlif@cs.indiana.edu
-----Original Message-----
From: assembly-89-bounce@lists.ticalc.org
[mailto:assembly-89-bounce@lists.ticalc.org] On Behalf Of Greg
Sent: Monday, September 02, 2002 12:27 AM
To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: [A89] Re: more questions (return value)
I would be awesome if you would scan that reference card! I will take a
look
at your disassembler, and the others that have been suggested... I am a
bit
warry of incorperating it into my project (Command Post) as I am not
100%
sure how the project will be licensed. Plus, the experience of writting
a
disassembler would be a good experience for me. I have the Motorola
books,
so i do (should) have all of the necessary information right there.
-Greg
----- Original Message -----
From: "John David Ratliff" <jdratlif@indiana.edu>
To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Sunday, September 01, 2002 7:29 PM
Subject: [A89] Re: more questions (return value)
>
> You know, I was thinking the same thing.
>
> I used the M68000 microprocessor programming reference card. There is
a
> class at my university which teaches microprocessor design using the
> 68k, and they sell this card at my local college bookstore. I couldn't
> find it on Motorola's site. If you like, I could scan it and put it up
> on technoplaza. It contains just the 68000 instructions (no 68010, 20,
> 30, or 40), and has handy references for all kinds of things. Then you
> can use the programmer's reference manual to cross-check for more
> detail.
>
> I just finished writing a simple disassembler which I want to make for
> the calc. I didn't find Tom's before I started writing my own. It's
open
> source and under the GPL if you want to help me bug test and convert
it.
> I released the first public beta today. http://www.technoplaza.net
It's
> missing branch/jump label support, and it would be nice to know what
> exact offset that would go to (like the VTI debugger does), but I
> haven't finished that yet. Next school term starts tomorrow, so I
don't
> know if I'll finish it in time. However, other than the large screen
> size it uses for the large file format, I think it would compile for
the
> calc right now. There would just need to be a way to tell it which
file
> to open, or where in memory to start the disassembly.
>
> If my code is no help, Thomas Nussbaumer includes complete source for
> his, as well. His already has label support, and turns things right
back
> into code, which I think will in turn compile. That's what I plan to
> finish on mine.
>
> John David Ratliff
> jdratlif@cs.indiana.edu
References: