[A89] Re: about a68k

To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: [A89] Re: about a68k
From: Sebastian Reichelt <SebastianR@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 21:19:04 +0200
In-Reply-To: <p05100300b9180902b70a@[192.168.0.3]>
References: <OE246Su94e5O25rrcvg000073a5@hotmail.com> <5.1.0.14.0.20020527105020.009e9a00@pop.gmx.de> <OE246Su94e5O25rrcvg000073a5@hotmail.com>
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org



>yes! that's what I thought... well, actually CodeWarrior and MPW both
>can create 68k binaries. The problem is the linker, and I'm not sure
>if there's any difference between binaries for 68000 and 680x0,
>although in CW I can explicity choose between 68k code and 68020, I
>assume that 68k is more universal. So, let's assume I can produce the
>68k binary, the problem is the linker... :(

You probably use CodeWarrior and MPW as compilers (but I don't know what 
MPW is).  Unfortunately, that won't work, as the TIOS calling convention is 
different from the standard (a0-a1/d0-d2 may be trashed, return value in a0 
or d0 depending on the type).  But if you have an assembler for 68k code, 
you can probably get it to produce an object file instead of an 
executable.  You need this file to be in either the COFF or the AmigaOS 
format; then you can use obj2ti, which is included in TIGCC (simply 
download the TIGCC sources and compile it with a C++ compiler, but you need 
to define or undefine BIG_ENDIAN).

Follow-Ups:

[A89] Re: about a68k

From: "R.A." <funkaster@mac.com>

References:

[A89] Re: about a68k

From: "TJ" <comfortably_numb_@hotmail.com>

[A89] Re: about a68k

From: Sebastian Reichelt <SebastianR@gmx.de>

[A89] Re: about a68k

From: "R.A." <funkaster@mac.com>