[A89] Re: A problem

To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: [A89] Re: A problem
From: Rob Smith <rob@kormoc.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 10:16:00 -0500
In-Reply-To: <009d01c0b33d$e00b7c80$cf02e0c7@athlon600>
References: <20010322230845.65A4418041@mx-1.sollentuna.net>
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org

At 3/22/2001 09:06 PM, you wrote:
>Interesting.  I just read this entry in the FAQ, but keep in mind that this
>is a _GCC extension_ and not _ANSI C_.

Could you explain why? I still don't fully understand how it works, so why 
would this not be valid in ansi c?

| That sounds strange -- are you sure that the non-array code is including 
a null byte at the end?

No i wasn't. That was the problem with it. passing it via char fn [] didn't 
need a null byte, but if they are the same, why did it work without one.

----
Rob Smith
Rob's Quote of this Reset:
A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend upon the support 
of Paul.
- George Bernard Shaw

References:

[A89] Re: A problem

From: "Scott Noveck" <noveck@pluto.njcc.com>

Prev: [A89] Re: A problem
Next: [A89] Re: A problem
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread