Re: A89: AMS 1.x vs 2.x?
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A89: AMS 1.x vs 2.x?
I can already retain my memory after a crash using 1.x.
-Dan
thedew@usit.net
----- Original Message -----
From: "Deja User" <turbosoft@my-deja.com>
To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 6:04 PM
Subject: RE: A89: AMS 1.x vs 2.x?
>
> upgrade both to version 2.04 (if you can find it, or if not 2.05)
> It will give you more Flash mem, and allow you to use Flash applications
from TI.
> Also, in case your calc gets reset or crashes, then it will retain your
archived programs.
> l'm sure there's others, too
>
> >From: "Daniel Wood" <thedew@usit.net>
> >To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> >Subject: A89: AMS 1.x vs 2.x?
> >Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 20:35:56 -0600
> >Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
> >
> >
> >I have both the TI-89 HW1 and HW2.
> >The HW1 is running AMS 1.0 while the HW2 is running AMS 1.5.
> >Should I upgrade either one, why, and what are the benefits(game wise vs
> >mathematics wise)?
> >
> >-Dan
> >thedew@usit.net
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> --== Sent via Deja.com ==--
> http://www.deja.com/
>
>
>
>
References: