Re: A89: Light Speed
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A89: Light Speed
Slashdot article http://slashdot.org/articles/99/02/18/0832249_F.shtml
At 1/8/2001 06:49 PM, you wrote:
>i don't know if it's applicable to say gravity 'has no mass'. gravity
>isn't something you measure in mass. it's like saying my certain kind of
>force is at a speed of zero. force doesn't have a speed component, so it's
>irrelevant. the 'no mass' topic comes into play when you're talking about
>an actual object that has a mass of 0. like a neutrino (almost 0, but not
>quite).
References: