Re: A89: old AMS

Re: A89: old AMS

• To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: A89: old AMS
• From: Olle Hedman <oh@hem.passagen.se>
• Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2001 22:01:58 +0100
• In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.0.20010101215749.02e50c10@mail.passagen.se>
• References: <000601c0734f$d7529ca0$76a4fea9@oemcomputer> <LAW-F89hBQpkiReq5UH000097e2@hotmail.com>
• Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org

Damn. I guess we all know what went wrong there.
I guess the lesson here is, don't send mail when you just came
home from a 2 day party...

///Olle

At 21:59 2001-01-01, you wrote:

>At 18:33 2000-12-31, you wrote:
>>does anyone have an older version of the AMS
>>i could use 2.01, 2.03, or 2.04
>>PLEASE!!!
>>someone help me!!!!!!!
>
>
>Sure, I've got 2.03. how do you want it delivered? :)
>(mail, http, ftp, dcc, icq, whatever?)
>
>///Olle
>
>

• From:
• From:
• Re: A89: old AMS
• From: Olle Hedman <oh@hem.passagen.se>

• Prev: Re: A89: old AMS
• Next: Re: A89: old AMS
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread