[A89] Re: movem

[A89] Re: movem

• To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
• Subject: [A89] Re: movem
• From: "TJ" <comfortably_numb_@hotmail.com>
• Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2001 18:40:02 -0500
• References: <5.0.2.1.0.20010422100037.00b4c018@mail.passagen.se> <001c01c0cb80$8ab8e780$b3902140@computer>
• Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org

I'm not totally sure but I would think they would be the same but just save
you some hassle of saving the registers one by one in your code

> Now I have a dilemma; it appears that when I just save and restore those
two
> registers (A2 & A5), that move and movem produce the same sized code. Is
one
> method faster than the other in this situation? I've looked at the
Motorola
> documentation, but am not sure how to decipher the timings for movem.

• [A89] Re: movem
• From: Bart <trzy@mailandnews.com>

• [A89] Re: movem
• From: Olle Hedman <oh@hem.passagen.se>
• [A89] Re: movem
• From: "Greg" <newstome2001@yahoo.com>

• Prev: [A89] Re: movem
• Next: [A89] Re: movem
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread