Re: A89: Re: C problem...
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A89: Re: C problem...
At 04:47 PM on Sunday, 5/28/00 +0200, you wrote:
>I missed that it echoed chars...
ok =P
>You defined the function as "void", meaning that it doesn't return a value. An
>empty "return" just exits the function - and can be placed anywhere
>*within* the
>function, even inside several levels of nested loops. But here it's both
>at the
>very end of the function _and_ in a function that doesn't return anything - so
>it's not necessary at all.
>(Of course, it might have been optimized away depending on how smart the
>compiler is)
ok, thanks for the help
----
Rob Smith
<a href="http://pa.ticalc.org">Visit Programmers Anonymous Today</a>
<a href="http://www.tigalaxy.com">Come and see the Improved TIGALAXY Web
site</a>
<a href="http://c489.tigalaxy.com">See the only C tutorial for the 89</a>
<a href="mailto:kormoc@netzero.net">Email-Me</a>
<a href="aim:addbuddy?screenname=Billvortex">Add Me To Your Buddy List</a>
----
Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?
Follow-Ups:
References: