A89: Re: Re: "C"

[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

A89: Re: Re: "C"


I like this idea, but perhaps we could even take it a few steps further,
changing the entire ticalc list setup:

C-programming  -- for all C related messages on any C capable calc
asm-68k -- for all 68k assembly related messages on any 68k based calc
asm-z80 -- for all z80 assembly related messages on any z80 based calc
system-85
system-86
system-89
etc.            -- for all _system programming and interface_ related
questions on the specific calc.

So, if you were going to make a TI-89 program in C, you would ask questions
about how to code a section in C-programming, and you would ask questions
about which the interface to a specific ROM function was in system-89.


Just some thoughts concerning a better system

--kaus


----- Original Message -----
From: "Sebastian Reichelt" <SebastianR@gmx.de>
To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2000 6:27 PM
Subject: A89: Re: "C"


>
> Hi,
>
> | We need another list for C programmers for the 89. C
> | is nice, but it's different from asm, and should kept
> | separate. It seems the "assembly-89" list has become
> | the "C-89" list.
>
> It doesn't have to be "C-89."  Why not call it just "C-Programming," since
> it would apply equally to the TI-89 and 92-Plus, and possibly to other
> calculators as well.  If you have something on one calculator, it should
be
> easy to port it to another.
>
> Just a suggestion.
>
> Sebastian Reichelt
>
>
Follow-Ups: References: