Re: A89: Re: Game Programming -- Pure Assembly vs. TI-GCC?

Re: A89: Re: Game Programming -- Pure Assembly vs. TI-GCC?

• To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
• Subject: Re: A89: Re: Game Programming -- Pure Assembly vs. TI-GCC?
• From: "Jean Canazzi" <jcanazzi@cybercable.fr>
• Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 09:56:03 +0100
• References: <200003100641.HAA19434@mail.utic.net.ba> <38C8A58B.9E44B557@drigon.com>
• Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org

>
> Hmm, OK... I'll probably try using TI-GCC then & see how it works.
>

An interesting option is gcc is the -S flag. Just type :
gcc -S myfile.c

and you will obtain a file named myfile.s that contains the assembly code
corresponding to your program. This way you can see how gcc produce its
code.
You may use it along the -Ox flag to see what is produced with differents
optimisations level.

--
Jean Canazzi
jcanazzi@cybercable.fr
http://www.multimania.com/bloozed/bigdyna.html

• A89: Re: Game Programming -- Pure Assembly vs. TI-GCC?
• From: "Zeljko Juric" <zjuric@utic.net.ba>
• Re: A89: Re: Game Programming -- Pure Assembly vs. TI-GCC?
• From: Seth Peelle <beat@drigon.com>

• Prev: Re: A89: Re: Game Programming -- Pure Assembly vs. TI-GCC?
• Next: Re: A89: Palet Shifting Routine
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread