RE: A89: Which is better?

To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: RE: A89: Which is better?
From: "Brady Simon" <bradys@mailandnews.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 08:57:32 -0600
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <200006010629.e516TUS26264@neretvica.utic.net.ba>
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org

Hehe OK :)
maybe you should have said that in the first place :)
Ow well that was a fun conversation anyways.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
[mailto:owner-assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org]On Behalf Of Zeljko Juric
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2000 12:15 AM
To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A89: Which is better?

Hi!

> Yes like he said extreme.

Again, note that my text is dedicated just for fun for good 
programmers. I think that main question from a newbie 
programmer is answered: C is much EASIER than ASM, without any
doubt. Anyway, C is always much easier for WRITING that ASM, 
and I think that this is what exactly he want to know. I only
wanted to note that although C is nearly always easy to WRITE,
it is sometimes hard to READ (but it may be perfectly readable).
And ASM is usually HARD for both WRITING and READING. Writing 
in ASM is much harder than in C, of course :-)

Zeljko Juric

References:

Re: A89: Which is better?

From: "Zeljko Juric" <zjuric@utic.net.ba>