Re: Re: A89: Seven level Grayscale
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Re: A89: Seven level Grayscale
> Thus, your reasoning allows us to clearly establish that 3 = 4. This
> method of grayscale analysis certainly will open a new era in
> mathematics.
[SNIP]
> different. Thus we can determine that
> 6 + 3 isn't equal to 5 + 4
Geez, I thought I bragged enough by myself. It's a good thing that you're
naivety didn't fail you out of Berkeley yet.
Nah, it appears that I can't count. That simple. (btw, is 1020100 fast
enough, now that we've established my technical genius?)
> We all must bow down to Scott's new mathematical insights, and curse
> foolish people who think they can do what he has shown to be impossible.
I now give you permission to start my official fan club, unless someone
would like to outbid me.
Anyone else who wants to harp on me for that post, please do. I deserve it.
Please allow me to go to bed and die of stupidity now. Geez, I wasted half
an hour on that last email, too. . .
-Scott
References: