Re: A89: Re: AMS Version?


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: A89: Re: AMS Version?




AHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

i can't get any of the AMS's to send.  i have them in two formats .89u and a self extracting-self-sending .exe file.  niether of them work.  what EXACTLY do i need to do, maybe i'm doing something wrong.

Nivek

  Patrick Davidson <pad@OCF.Berkeley.EDU> wrote:




On Tue, 25 Jul 2000, Kevin Goodsell wrote:

> My understanding was that, like with most previous releases, 2.04 had
> near zero compatibility when it was released not very long ago. TI
> *does* distribute old AMS versions if you ask them (email
> ti-cares@ti.com) but I'm sure you can download them somewhere. Someone
> sent all the previous versions to me via email once, so I've got them
> on hand if all else fails.

I actually installed 2.04 on my calculator when it was released (before
anything was changed to improve compatibility with it) and found that it
had a much better compatibility than what you mention on a HW1
calculator. When I used TEOS, I found that about 3 or 4 out of the 12
assembly games I tried had problems. But Universal OS is much better
for this ROM version. With it, 11 programs ran with no problems, and
one (Fernando 3C) worked partially. However, I have heard that the
situation is worse for HW2.

I tested the recently-released AMS 2.05 (under VTI only) and it appeared
to have the same level of compatibility, though I didn't test as many
programs.



Do You Yahoo!?
Get Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere!
Follow-Ups: