Can you not just telnet in and look at it? Serial hookup, etc.
Mark E. Scott Jr.
mscott@databasecity.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Wood [mailto:thedew@usit.net]
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2000 9:10 PM
To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A89: Me distributing roms.
i'll have to do some testing but now I use DU Meter and it records bursts of
19.1k at times(only used the stopwatch twice).
Gonna get atguard tomarrow and see what that does in Win2k.
-Dan
thedew@usit.net
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Scott" <mscott@rocket.mscott.dbcity.com>
To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2000 8:46 PM
Subject: RE: A89: Me distributing roms.
> Like someone else said, watch your router itself. If you truly are only
> using 64k and not bursting to 128k, you should only be able to get
> around 6-7k in the browser. On my router, I can watch the actual
> throughput and no matter what the browser says, it never goes over its
> max. Some routers can go faster than others, but not significantly so.
>
> Mark E. Scott Jr.
> mscott@databasecity.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Wood [mailto:thedew@usit.net]
> Sent: Monday, January 17, 2000 8:36 PM
> To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
> Subject: Re: A89: Me distributing roms.
>
>
> on my 64k isdn I can sustain 11.5k for hours by simply setting getright
> to
> dnload 8 files from the same server.
>
> -Dan
> thedew@usit.net
> See my art works @ http://msneptune.net (site coming soon, just a
> holdover
> :)
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Eric Greening" <littlbit@txcyber.com>
> To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> Sent: Monday, January 17, 2000 1:21 AM
> Subject: Re: A89: Me distributing roms.
>
>
> >
> > I've gotten 10k/s on a 56k but, it only lasted for ~10 seconds.
> >
> > Eric Greening
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Serial <Serial@earthlink.net>
> > To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> > Date: Monday, January 17, 2000 6:40 AM
> > Subject: RE: A89: Me distributing roms.
> >
> >
> > >
> > >Have you ever gotten 7k/s on a 56k modem? I've not ever gotten above
> 5.6
> > >myself
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: owner-assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
> > >[mailto:owner-assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org]On Behalf Of Miles Raymond
> > >Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2000 10:12 PM
> > >To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
> > >Subject: Re: A89: Me distributing roms.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >A few things. A 56Kbps modem is not the same as a 5.6KBps modem.
> > >
> > >b = bit
> > >B = byte
> > >K = kilo
> > >M = mega
> > >G = giga
> > >p = per
> > >s = second
> > >
> > >8b = 1B
> > >1024B = 1KB
> > >1024KB = 1MB
> > >1024MB = 1GB
> > >
> > >8Kb = 8192b = 1024B = 1KB
> > >8Kbps = 1KBps
> > >56Kbps = 7KBps
> > >
> > >A 1mbit cable line would NOT be 100kilobytes per second, but rather
> > 1024Kbps
> > >(kilobits per second), or 128KBps (kilobytes per second).
> > >
> > >> I may not know how to do anything but hello world in asm but
> networking
> I
> > >do
> > >> know =]
> > >
> > >Maybe you should get to know it a little better then...
> > >
> > >-Miles Raymond EML: m_rayman@bigfoot.com
> > >ICQ: 13217756 IRC: Killer2 AIM: kilier2
> > >http://www.bigfoot.com/~m_rayman
> > >
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: "Serial" <Serial@earthlink.net>
> > >To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> > >Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2000 8:09 PM
> > >Subject: RE: A89: Me distributing roms.
> > >
> > >> I believe his math is wrong. The OC256 that at&t is laying across
> the
> > >> atlantic to connect the 2 continents is a 2 gbit line which would
> roughly
> > >be
> > >> ~200meg/s
> > >> the quick conversion for (g)(m)(k)bits/s is to just add 2 zero's
> and
> > >reduce
> > >> to a lower letter if nessessary.
> > >> for example. a 56kbit modem like an x2 is really 5.6 kilobytes max
> > >> downstream
> > >> and a 384k/s downstream dsl would be ~38.4 kilobytes /s
> > >> a 1mbit cable line would be 100kilobytes per second. etc.
> > >> I may not know how to do anything but hello world in asm but
> networking
> I
> > >do
> > >> know =]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>