Re: A89: Me distributing roms.
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A89: Me distributing roms.
So, by similar logic, if someone leaves their door unlocked, you would
feel justified in walking into their house even if you don'e even know
them?
Or if I had a truck (the computer) and I wanted your lawnmower, and it
was just sitting there on your lawn without any gate (passwords) or
for-sale sign on it (no payment), it would be legal for me to put the
lawnmower in my truck (download) and drive away with it?
Cassady Roop
Serial wrote:
>
> Simple. There is no payment to download it and it is not protected by any
> passwords or compression. It'd be like if adobe put a full download of
> photoshop in their site for free and said we're breaking the law if we
> download it.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
> [mailto:owner-assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org]On Behalf Of Cassady Roop
> Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2000 6:22 PM
> To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
> Subject: Re: A89: Me distributing roms.
>
> > hold no rights over public property and if they have a problem with that
> I'd
> > like to hear about it in person. If you work for Ti mail me and I'll call
> > you personally and you can explain why you think you have a right to stop
> > the distrobution of public software through the use of threats and
> reporting
>
> How exactly does a ROM TI wrote fall under the term 'public property'
> unless they say it does? (which they don't)
>
> Cassady Roop
Follow-Ups:
References: