A89: Re: Re: Re: Re: tigcc - some REAL routines this time [OT]

To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: A89: Re: Re: Re: Re: tigcc - some REAL routines this time [OT]
From: "Scott Noveck" <noveck@pluto.njcc.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 17:05:04 -0500
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org


> Well, i Think that is enough. Even thought  I probably just killed my view
> for all of you I still belive that C is a subset of C++. Althought I must
> admit that they arn't 100% compatible.

To paraphrase Bjorn Stroustroup, while C is not a subset of C++ in a strict
mathematical sense, he still considers it such for all real intents and
purposes - and who are we to argue with him?  Heck, he WROTE C++ =)

    -Scott

Prev: A89: This settles it
Next: Re: A89: Re: tigcc - some REAL routines this time
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread