A89: Re: Re: Re: Re: TIGCC
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
A89: Re: Re: Re: Re: TIGCC
Hi!
> This is not the problem. The problem is that at least a
> prototype for the function has to appear BEFORE the call
> to the function.
Oops. I didn't noticed this...
> Strange. What I thought was that people would either turn
> warnings off (which would automatically allow implicit
> declarations as well) or fix every place a warning is
> reported. Of course, if someone has never used the IDE
> before, this is different, but it has been existing for
> more than half a year now. Of course, I will have this box
> checked in the next release.
This IS strange, but people ARE strange in general ;-)
Merry Christmas to everybody!
Zeljko Juric