Re: A89: Re: C sources

To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: A89: Re: C sources
From: "Matthew Landry" <mhlandry1@home.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2000 10:38:35 -0500
References: <20000815.093418.-232459.5.Fuzmeister@juno.com>
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org


Scott does not like how I check for collisions.  He thinks I should just
test pixels, which would be faster and smaller, but to me, that is
unorthodox.

-Matthew Landry

----- Original Message -----
From: "Steven M Thompson" <fuzmeister@juno.com>
To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2000 8:34 AM
Subject: Re: A89: Re: C sources


>
> How is CNibbles' source unorthodox?
>
> What bad habits will it promote? I was just wondering since
> I am learning C and was using CNibbles' source for starters.
>
> Thanks,
> S. Thompson
>
>

References:

Re: A89: Re: C sources

From: Steven M Thompson <fuzmeister@juno.com>

Prev: Re: A89: Re: C sources
Next: Re: A89: Kernel Programming
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread