A89: ooops (was Re: interrupts in C code)

A89: ooops (was Re: interrupts in C code)

• To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
• Subject: A89: ooops (was Re: interrupts in C code)
• From: "Scott Noveck" <noveck@pluto.njcc.com>
• Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2000 04:26:15 -0400
• Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org

That email was supposed to go to a different list. . . no one is gonna
understand that, not to mention the fact that I broke my cardinal rule of
not sending attachments to the list.  Except maybe zeljko, who seems to
understand everything.  ah well.  that's what happens when I'm sending email
at 4:07 AM =(

Thanks to Scott Dial for pointing out my idiocracy.  He's having a great
time laughing at me in #tcpa, too.  And with that, I'm off to sleep. . .
what a great way to end a night =(

    -Scott

• Re: A89: ooops (was Re: interrupts in C code)
• From: Olle Hedman <oh@hem.passagen.se>
• Re: A89: ooops =?iso-8859-1?q?=28was?= Re: interrupts in C =?iso-8859-1?q?code=29?=
• From: Jonas =?iso-8859-1?q?L=F6=F6f?= <f96jolo@dd.chalmers.se>

• Prev: A89: interrupt in C code
• Next: Re: A89: Re: Re: Re: Re: Grayscale troubles
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread