Re: A89: Re: Re: Re: Re: Grayscale troubles

Re: A89: Re: Re: Re: Re: Grayscale troubles

• To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
• Subject: Re: A89: Re: Re: Re: Re: Grayscale troubles
• From: "James Darpinian" <J112282@prodigy.net>
• Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2000 14:32:14 -0400
• References: <20000803165830.5DB8AA4026@towerguard.edu.sollentuna.se> <001f01bffd98$4db61c60$cb02e0c7@Pnoveck> <002e01bffd89$0096e860$dbd6c540@default> <20000804033910.A29806@m101.ryd.student.liu.se> <000701bffda4$9b8c72c0$6ad7c540@default> <20000804155706.A30409@m101.ryd.student.liu.se>
• Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org

> CONCLUSION: Grayscale "in software" on HW2 is just (or not far from) as
fast
> as grayscale "in hardware" on HW1. (And don't forget that when the HW2 CPU
is
> doing something "useful", it's doing it 20% faster than the HW1 CPU.)
>
Interesting again...
However, HW2 grayscale is still lower quality than HW1.  Somebody should
work on that.  We still must not have it synchronized yet.  Or, maybe the
LCD runs off a different timer in HW2, so it's impossible to synchronize!

> If^H^HWhen the SDK is released, it will describe the software interface
> only. The hardware may change (HW1->HW2), but the software interface will
> stay the same.

I forgot TI is so arrogant they think everyone will only want to use their
(slow) software interface instead of directly accessing the hardware.  Darn!

    James Darpinian

• From:
• A89: Re: Re: Re: Grayscale troubles
• From: "Scott Noveck" <noveck@pluto.njcc.com>
• A89: Re: Re: Re: Re: Grayscale troubles
• From: "James Darpinian" <J112282@prodigy.net>
• Re: A89: Re: Re: Re: Re: Grayscale troubles
• From: Johan <johei804@student.liu.se>
• Re: A89: Re: Re: Re: Re: Grayscale troubles
• From: "James Darpinian" <J112282@prodigy.net>
• Re: A89: Re: Re: Re: Re: Grayscale troubles
• From: Johan <johei804@student.liu.se>

• Prev: Re: A89: Re: Re: Re: Re: Grayscale troubles
• Next: Re: A89: Re: Re: Re: Re: Grayscale troubles
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread