A89: Re: Re: c vs asm


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

A89: Re: Re: c vs asm




haha, ok. sounds good :-D
is C basically the same as C++? i mean, if i know a little C++, will i do
alright with C? or like, do i need to find tutorials specifically on C and
not C++...

thanks :)

-----Original Message-----
From: Juan Corral <juancorral@lvcm.com>
To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: Sunday, April 23, 2000 10:17 PM
Subject: A89: Re: c vs asm


>
>Well, since it seems that this list has become the "C-89" list, I would say
>learn C.  Besides, Zeljko Juric is busy writing some great documentation
for
>it.  If I had the time to do it again, I'd probably learn C instead of the
>crappy ASM I know.  Oh well.
>
>Juan
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Hatch
>To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
>Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2000 11:16 PM
>Subject: A89: c vs asm
>
>
>hey everyone... ok, im thinking about doing C instead of ASM for games on
>the 89... but i wanna know what you think, i know really no C, im grasping
>asm a little. i wanted to know how much easier C is compared to the asm.
>would i be better off just learning asm for now? since i already started?
>
>




Follow-Ups: