Re: A89: placing data into C variables from ASM(" ") constructs

Re: A89: placing data into C variables from ASM(" ") constructs

• To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
• Subject: Re: A89: placing data into C variables from ASM(" ") constructs
• From: "Mark Leverentz" <MarkLeverentz@hotmail.com>
• Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 17:27:46 -0500
• References: <0.711a1e02.253662a3@aol.com> <005901bf1609$11264260$0201a8c0@sparta.lu.se>
• Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org

>  move.w 4(%a6),%d0

But isn't the SP a7?  So wouldn't it be:

move.w 4(%a7),%d0

and isn't the reason that there a 4 bytes allocated by GCC because the top 4
bytes are a longword representing the address that the currrent function
should return to?  Not just because it's using the LINK instruction?

Mark Leverentz

• Re: A89: placing data into C variables from ASM(" ") constructs
• From: Zoltan Kocsi <zoltan@bendor.com.au>

• Re: A89: placing data into C variables from ASM(" ") constructs
• From: TurboSoft@aol.com
• Re: A89: placing data into C variables from ASM(" ") constructs
• From: "Niklas Brunlid" <e96nbr@efd.lth.se>

• Prev: Re: A89: Re: Various 68K/TI89 things
• Next: Re: A89: placing data into C variables from ASM(" ") constructs
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread