Re: A89: Re: ok, someone clear this up!!!

To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A89: Re: ok, someone clear this up!!!
From: "Bryan E Rabeler" <rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1999 17:18:55 -0500 (EST)
In-Reply-To: <011201bf3a22$e36c7c20$0265a8c0@oierw.net> from "Mathew Ryden" at Nov 28, 99 10:33:17 pm
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org


Obviously.. it was released on some french TI fan webpage, not on TI.COM.  The
fact that http://www.ti.com/calc/flash/89.htm still shows 1.05 tells us that
this is not an official release.  Probably some guy that was beta testing it
released his version/copy without permission.

Bryan

>
>
> Well, this is a non-TI released bootleg-ish AMS 2. It is version 2.01, which
> may mean that there were some bugs in 2.00 that they felt were needed to
> work out before release, and there is even a good chance that it isn't being
> released bedcuase they may have adopted *gasp* rigid testing procedures.
> There is a good chance that AMS 2.00 will never be released, unless it is a
> renamed version of 2.01 (but then THAT would be stupid). There really is no
> difference between the two other than one has fewer bugs than the other (I'm
> not even going to guess which is which). Now, I can feel myself starting to
> ramble, so I should stop talking... soon...
>
> > What's up with this new ROM??  Some people are saying it's 2.00 and some
> say it's
> > 2.01.....I just wanna know which one  is it and what's the difference
> between 2.00 and
> > 2.01....and I don't want some little smart alleck answer from some person
> who doesn't know
> > what he/she is talking about either.  I want an answer that will tell me
> exactly what the
> > difference is.  Thanks!
> > Bryan F
>
> Mathew
>
>
>

References:

A89: Re: ok, someone clear this up!!!

From: "Mathew Ryden" <dryden19-2@idt.net>