Re: Re: A89: Re: Fw: TI-89 ROM 1.05 vs 2.00 version inquiries
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Re: A89: Re: Fw: TI-89 ROM 1.05 vs 2.00 version inquiries
What kind of checksum does HW1 have?
Bryan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Miles Raymond" <m_rayman@bigfoot.com>
To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Monday, November 22, 1999 12:22 AM
Subject: Re: Re: A89: Re: Fw: TI-89 ROM 1.05 vs 2.00 version inquiries
>
> Actually, as I posted previously, the HW2 isn't all that much better than
> HW1. From what I discern, everything that HW2 is can be put into effect
on
> the HW1 save the ROM protection, which is faulty on the HW1. In my
opinion,
> that is what is best about HW1. Should we eventually figure out how to
send
> our own ROM, we could write our own OS for the 89 on HW1. It still might
be
> possible with the HW2 (decrypt TI's 512 bit RSA checksum...) but it is
> highly unprobable.
>
> -Miles Raymond EML: m_rayman@bigfoot.com
> ICQ: 13217756 IRC: Killer2 AIM: KilIer2 (kilier2)
> http://www.bigfoot.com/~m_rayman/
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Bryan Rabeler <rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu>
> To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> Sent: Sunday, November 21, 1999 9:49 PM
> Subject: Re: Re: A89: Re: Fw: TI-89 ROM 1.05 vs 2.00 version inquiries
>
> > But the point is, as time goes on, the number of HW1 calculators will be
> > very small compared to HW2 calculators. Some authors might not care
about
> > HW1 calculators and want to use the advantages of the HW2 calculators.
> >
> > Bryan
> *CLIP*
>
>
>
Follow-Ups:
References: