re: Re: Re: A89: Re: Fw: TI-89 ROM 1.05 vs 2.00 version inquiries

[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

re: Re: Re: A89: Re: Fw: TI-89 ROM 1.05 vs 2.00 version inquiries


I will contact TI so that they won't get a letter that sounds like a whiny little kid.  And I didn't 
say he was 10, just that he was acting like my 10 year old brother (there's a big difference 
there), and I said "bitching" which I consider crass language.
I do agree with you on the HW1 issue.  I love my calc and I wouldn't trade it for a HW2 
version.
Bryan


> ** Original Subject: Re: Re: A89: Re: Fw: TI-89 ROM 1.05 vs 2.00 version inquiries
> ** Original Sender: "Miles Raymond" <m_rayman@bigfoot.com>
> ** Original Date: Sat, 20 Nov 1999 12:59:26 -0600

> ** Original Message follows... 

>
> Hmm, rereading this...
> 
> You complain that he's whining, but you'll contact TI for him...
> You say he's 10 yrs old w/o knowing his age...
> You apologize for the 'crass language' that's not there...
> 
> But I am all in support of another petition to TI for new hardware.  I will
> just say that if it's offered to me to switch my HW1 w/ a HW2, then I will
> keep my HW1 just the same.  I don't care what other ppl think about games
> and such and the HW2's being the major development calc.  From what I can
> discern, any program written for HW2 (that doesn't use the keyboard matrix
> [et al] directly) will work perfectly fine on an HW1.
> 
> -Miles Raymond      EML: m_rayman@bigfoot.com
> ICQ: 13217756       IRC: Killer2        AIM: KilIer2 (kilier2)
> http://www.bigfoot.com/~m_rayman/
> 
> ----- Original Message -----From: <mxpxfifws@yahoo.com>
> To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> Sent: Saturday, November 20, 1999 12:51 AM
> Subject: re: Re: A89: Re: Fw: TI-89 ROM 1.05 vs 2.00 version inquiries
> 
> > Ok, sorry for my use of crass language, but quit bitching to us and
> complain to TI.
> > That's who you want to address in the first place, right??  Personally,
> I'm glad I have HW1
> > because I can run grayscale games.  But if you feel the need to have the
> speed and the lack
> > of grayscale, don't complain to us.  Write the company and tell them in a
> manner that is
> > mature and considerate.  Don't write something like you just did that
> sounds like you deserve
> > this because really you don't.  Simply state your problem, ask them why
> they did this, and
> > present your solution.  And another thing, don't sound like you're whining
> either.  What you
> > just wrote sounds something like what my 10 year old brother sounds like
> when he wants
> > something.  If you'd like, I'll even be nice and contact TI for you!  How
> bout that??  Just tell
> > me who to write to and I'll do it.  Sorry for being mean about this, but
> the whining gets old
> > guys.  Anyway, write back to the list if you want me to write TI for us as
> a group!!!
> > Bryan
> >
> > > ** Original Subject: Re: A89: Re: Fw: TI-89 ROM 1.05 vs 2.00 version
> inquiries
> > > ** Original Sender: "Zeromus Mog" <zeromusmog@home.com>
> > > ** Original Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 15:17:40 -0800
> >
> > > ** Original Message follows...
> >
> > > Heck, anyone want to start a petition? This is extremely annoying- TI
> > > promised that these new calcs would never need to be replaced since all
> you
> > > need is to upgrade the FlashROM and it will work just fine and spiffy-
> so
> > > they release a new type of 89 with a faster processor (Editor's Note: I
> just
> > > read that the processor is the same, but there's a new LCD thingy that
> makes
> > > graphing faster) and an archive loophole lockout, but they don't TELL
> you
> > > that- they try and keep it hidden. I agree with Indifference here- they
> > > should offer a free or VERY cheap trade-in ($10+S&H is bordering on
> highway
> > > robbery as none of us were supposed to pay anything in the first place)
> for
> > > us poor saps (read: savvy calculator users) who bought the thing when it
> > > came out.
> > >
> > > First they don't give us any usuable info in the 89 and now this...
> thanks a
> > > lot, TI!
> > >
> > > -Zero
> > >
> > > P.S. Could a flash app be made to store things in Archive memory on the
> new
> > > 89s that have Archive Lockout? I posted something like this idea way
> back
> > > before AU ever came out, where a Flash App could be used to store
> programs
> > > and data inside the flash program itself so that you can get stuff back
> > > if/when your calc crashes. Of course, we have to wait for the SDK. :P
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----From: Indifference
> <agrawal1327@earthlink.net>
> > > To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> > > Sent: Friday, November 19, 1999 1:16 PM
> > > Subject: Re: A89: Re: Fw: TI-89 ROM 1.05 vs 2.00 version inquiries
> > >
> > > > They should put up some kind of trade in program.
> > > >
> > > > For example, trade in for $10 plus shipping
> > > >
> > > > Indifference
> > > >
> > > > TGaArdvark@aol.com wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > That makes me angry.. I have an original TI-89.  I want a new one!
> :)
> > > > >
> > > > > Ya, you buy it for the flash, assuming you'll always have the best.
> > > > > And then they upgrade everything else.
> 


>** --------- End Original Message ----------- **

> 



Download NeoPlanet at http://www.neoplanet.com


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com
Follow-Ups: