Re: A89: Re: ATTN: The guy who had the "source" of AU.

Re: A89: Re: ATTN: The guy who had the "source" of AU.

• To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: A89: Re: ATTN: The guy who had the "source" of AU.
• From: Zoltan Kocsi <zoltan@bendor.com.au>
• Date: Wed, 3 Nov 1999 14:45:30 +1100 (EST)
• In-Reply-To: <004601bf259d$0242f920$0100a8c0@qni.com>
• References: <004301bf258e$a60cbe60$3702e0c7@desktop> <14367.33184.794328.129414@tade.bendor.com.au> <004601bf259d$0242f920$0100a8c0@qni.com>
• Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org

Miles Raymond writes:

 > Hmm... Thought provoking.  Strong words for a strong subject?  Lacks art.

True, but you have to admit that at least I omitted the ultrastrong
expressions like "warez", "sux" and "rulez" -  not much, but at least 
a promising start, I guess. I try my best. 
 
 > Conclusion: Interesting.  I wish I could find out more about those
 > TI-hammers.  Now I want one.

:-) 
 
Regards,

Zoltan

--

I went to an IQ test recently. Lucky me, it's negative.

• Re: A89: Re: ATTN: The guy who had the "source" of AU.
• From: "Scott Noveck" <noveck@pluto.njcc.com>
• Re: A89: Re: ATTN: The guy who had the "source" of AU.
• From: Zoltan Kocsi <zoltan@bendor.com.au>
• Re: A89: Re: ATTN: The guy who had the "source" of AU.
• From: "Miles Raymond" <m_rayman@bigfoot.com>

• Prev: Re: A89: Re: ATTN: The guy who had the "source" of AU.
• Next: Re: A89: domain and range
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread