Re: A89: TI89 Site & Math-(not a serious responce)

To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A89: TI89 Site & Math-(not a serious responce)
From: ZeromusMog@aol.com
Date: Fri, 7 May 1999 22:15:15 EDT
Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Delivered-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org


In a message dated 5/6/99 11:09:28 PM Pacific Daylight Time, dux@acz.org 
writes:

> maybe in never-never land.  according to nintendo the gb and gbc are 1 and 2
>  MHz respectively, but that's measured in instructions per second.  if you
>  measure it in t-states per second (the way zilog does for god knows what
>  wacked out reason) then the gb and gbc variations are 4 and 8 MHz
>  respectively.  compared to the 68000 in the 89 (10MHz), the double speed
>  mode on the gbc is still 8MHz slower than the 89 and a ti-8x is about 8.5
>  MHz slower than the 89/92/92+ (assuming that motorolla measures frequency 
by
>  instructions per second as most normal companies do ;-)

And all this time I thought that the 89 was so much faster (i.e. a heck of a 
lot more than 2 mhz) because of the expanded instruction set...

Prev: A89: *_*_*_*_*M_O_R_E_M_E_M*_*_*_*_*
Next: A89: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Street=20fighter=20II=200.19=DF?=
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread