No Topic | Was:(Re: A89: Libs)
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
No Topic | Was:(Re: A89: Libs)
Well, that all depends upon whose code it is! =P
See, my code could probably do 100 (?) grey polygons per second where as a
very very good programmer might be able to do 1000+?
OT: Has anyone else taken their TI-89 apart? I had to take it apart to
clean the keys (because someone spilled Fruitopia on it... grr...) and I
noticed that the majority of the space inside the case is wasted...
-Miles Raymond EML: m_rayman@bigfoot.com
ICQ: 13217756 IRC: Killer2 AIM: MRayMan
http://www.bigfoot.com/~m_rayman/
-----Original Message-----
From: ZeromusMog@aol.com <ZeromusMog@aol.com>
To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: Wednesday, March 31, 1999 12:06 AM
Subject: Re: A89: Libs
>In a message dated 3/29/99 8:47:40 PM Pacific Standard Time,
>m_rayman@bigfoot.com writes:
>
>> Hmm... I wonder who that was aimed at... =P
>
>Well... you've learned your lesson about that, so don't worry. :) BTW,
since
>we're talking about Star Fox, I have a hypothetical question that has been
>bugging the heck out of me and I want some "expert" (well, whatever works)
>opinions on this:
>
>Using 4-level greyscale, how many polygons per second could the 89 handle?
>
>Betcha it's not anywhere CLOSE to the 75 Million that the PSX 2 can handle.
;)
Follow-Ups: