Re: A89: Archive Utility v2.00

Re: A89: Archive Utility v2.00

• To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: A89: Archive Utility v2.00
• From: Olle Hedman <oh@hem.passagen.se>
• Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 23:36:56 +0200
• Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
• Delivered-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
• References: <003001beb040$ed6b99c0$20200a0a@whitehat> <375B75C6.603B@prodigy.net> <00fe01beb3e7$159ed2a0$2da1cdcf@rutgers.edu> <001701beb699$cda13be0$0e23fea9@qni.com>
• Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org

Miles Raymond wrote:
> 
> A ROM upgrade that fixes the ROM upgrade routine?  This could be possible...
> has anyone thought that TI might have purposely made this <bug> so they
> could in the future, upgrade the ROM upgrade routine?

That seems quite far fetched, considering the nature of "the bug".. :)

//Olle

• Re: A89: Archive Utility v2.00
• From: "SirKnight" <sirknight@mindless.com>
• Re: A89: Archive Utility v2.00
• From: c2b <c2b@prodigy.net>
• Re: A89: Archive Utility v2.00
• From: "Dux Gregis" <dux@acz.org>
• Re: A89: Archive Utility v2.00
• From: "Miles Raymond" <m_rayman@bigfoot.com>

• Prev: A89: Re: PDF Files (OT)
• Next: A89: Assembling
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread