Re: A89: About the ROM-write bug. . .

To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A89: About the ROM-write bug. . .
From: c2b <c2b@prodigy.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 1999 03:45:24 -0400
Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Delivered-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Organization: Prodigy Internet
References: <006e01beb143$71726480$1c02e0c7@desktop>
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org


Scott Noveck wrote:
> 
> As far as I know now, the only ones who know exactly how to use this bug are
> Rusty, Dux (I think), the guys who wrote ArchUtil, and possibly Xavier
> Vassor. . . I say that we keep it somewhat closly guarded for two reasons --
> first, we don't want anyone writing a virus, and second, I *do not* want to
> see TI fix this bug in AMS (Advanced Mathematics Software) 2.00.  I think
> that the prospect of all the possible good programs we could write using
> this bug - such as ArchUtil - are too good to give up.  In addition, I think
> that Doors and Plusshell might even use this to install the kernel. . . Dux,
> you're the expert here =)
> 
> Besides, I kinda like ArchUtil - even if my calc is broken and I can't use
> it =)

Think for a second.  Just continue using the old AMS software if you
don't want the bug use a fixed version.  It just struck me (no sarcasm)
it might work as a last result.
C2b3

References:

A89: About the ROM-write bug. . .

From: "Scott Noveck" <noveck@pluto.njcc.com>

Prev: Re: A89: Archive Utility v2.00
Next: Re: A89: TI89 ROM vs. HP49 ROM
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread