A89: Re: Assembly-89 Digest V1 #727

To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: A89: Re: Assembly-89 Digest V1 #727
From: "Scott Noveck" <noveck@pluto.njcc.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 16:10:12 -0400
Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Delivered-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org


>Don't feel cheated! TI has one major thing that they did that can excuse a
>fairly bloated program: flashROM. Had we had to wait for them to optomize
the
>code, we would have had to wait until we graduated from High School before
>they released the TI89. By having a FlashROM and leaving more room for
>upgradability, and waiting for later to optomize (or perhaps even a rewrite
>in Assembly), we can get the calculator earlier. I don't feel cheated.


. . . or they could have conned us into buying new calcs early and never
meet the promise of upgrades =)

Prev: Re: A89: AU 2.00 "bug" explanations
Next: RE: A89: Re: Assembly-89 Digest V1 #727
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread